Netloom · Restaurants
A restaurant website has one job before it has any other. Most of them get it wrong, and it is not a design problem.
That is it. That is the whole visit, for the overwhelming majority of people who land on a restaurant site. They are hungry, they are deciding between you and two others, and they are on a phone.
So the menu is one tap from anywhere on the site, and the opening hours are exact — not "open daily", but the actual times, including the afternoon break. A beautiful site where the menu is a downloadable PDF has failed. We have seen that PDF cost more bookings than a bad logo ever did.
The things that decide whether a site in this trade works, which are rarely the things a brochure talks about.
In this market they decide whether someone orders at all. If the physical menu card does not mark them, that is a conversation to have before the site goes live, not after.
Not the most expensive one, and not "everything". One photograph of the thing regulars come back for does more than a gallery of twelve.
Customers are checking whether the place looks like somewhere they want to sit. Stock food photography reads as a chain, and reads as hiding something.
Sending someone to an aggregator looks like a loss, but the alternative is them searching for you there anyway and finding a competitor first.
Your FSSAI licence number has to be on display, and the website counts. We put it in the footer of every page as standard. It costs nothing, it is legally required, and a customer who looks for it and finds it trusts the rest of the page more.
Built, running, and open right now. Not a screenshot — open it on your phone and use it.
Fixed, published, and the same for every trade. You see your homepage before you pay anything.
A presence that works: home, menu or services, about, contact.
Adds gallery, testimonials, FAQ and the booking or enquiry flow.
The full build, or a store that takes money on the site.
You see your homepage before you pay anything. WhatsApp is fastest.